Vol. I — No. 1
Exploring the craft of creators & commerce

INFLUENCE LAB

The Death of Lazy Influencer Marketing (and What’s Replacing It in 2025)

The Death of Lazy Influencer Marketing (and What’s Replacing It in 2025)

Is influencer marketing dead? Discover what tactics are dying off and the modern strategies that are driving real ROI in 2025.

Reading time icon
15 min read
Estimated reading time
Calendar icon
September 24, 2025
Published date
Creator Economy

Is Influencer Marketing Dead? Here's What's Actually Dying

Is influencer marketing dead? No - and it's not even sick. What is dying are one-off #ad posts, follower-count obsessions, and vanity metrics. The brands winning in 2025 are intent-led and data-driven, matching creators to high-intent moments (think travel vloggers who had a major flight delay this week), giving creators creative control, and measuring real business impact - not just likes or views. Below, we break down the data-backed playbook.

TL;DR - Not Dead, Just Evolving

Global influencer marketing industry growth (2016–2024). The market surged from roughly $1.7 B in 2016 to about $24 B in 2024, according to Statista, reflecting the channel’s explosive expansion.

Influencer marketing isn’t dead; it’s maturing into a smarter model. Old playbooks - like blasting one-off sponsored posts and picking influencers by follower count - are dying off. New playbooks focus on quality over quantity. Brands are shifting toward micro- and nano-influencers with tight-knit, trusted communities, and forging always-on partnerships instead of hit-and-run campaigns. Success is measured in pipeline and ROI, not vanity metrics. A simple framework sums it up: R×R×C (Relevance × Recency × Credibility). And AI-driven social search is emerging as the secret weapon to target in-moment intent signals at scale.

Key Takeaway

Focus on relevance, recency, and credibility. Always-on partnerships with the right creators outperform one-off sponcon.

What's Actually Dying (and Why)

In 2025, the tactics that give influencer marketing a bad name are what’s on life support. Let’s autopsy the dying parts:

  • One-off “sponcon” without narrative fit: Single sponsored posts with no story or follow-up just don’t move the needle anymore. Engagement rates on isolated #ad drops have eroded as audiences scroll past inauthentic inserts. Brands are learning that parachuting in for one paid post is forgettable; consistency and narrative are key to credibility.
  • “Spray & pray” by follower count: Chasing mega-influencer reach while ignoring relevance is a fading practice. Recent Nielsen and ANA surveys show trust in mega-influencers sliding, while roughly two-thirds of marketers now prefer smaller creators. It turns out a million indifferent followers are less valuable than 10,000 who truly care.
  • Vanity metrics over real outcomes: Likes and views look nice, but they don’t guarantee sales. Brands used to rely on these surface metrics; now they demand proof of conversions. Industry research still finds about three in ten brands failing to measure influencer ROI at all – a shocking gap. Today’s programs are ditching shallow engagement metrics and focusing on CPL, CAC, and revenue lift from creator campaigns.
  • Over-scripted briefs (no creator voice): Overly prescriptive campaigns - where every caption is vetted to death - are dying because they kill authenticity. Audiences can tell when ten creators post the exact same caption. It’s cringe. No wonder 65% of influencers say they want more creative involvement instead of rigid scripts. Brands are learning to set guardrails but let creators speak in their own voice, which yields content that feels genuine.
  • Thin attribution & poor tracking: Brands that don’t use UTM links, affiliate codes or controlled tests are flying blind. Not tracking properly makes it impossible to prove ROI, leading some to think influencer marketing “doesn’t work.” Leading brands now insist on robust attribution: unique discount codes, trackable links, and even holdout regions or lift studies. (If you’re not doing this, you’re stuck in 2018.)

What Still Works in 2025

So, what is driving ROI in modern influencer programs? A few strategies are proving effective:

  • Micro and nano creators with tight communities: Smaller creators may have fewer followers, but they often deliver higher engagement and conversion per follower. Their audiences are niche, loyal, and trust their recommendations. Recent benchmarking studies show marketers credit micro-influencers with the strongest ROI, thanks to that sense of familiarity. These creators feel like friends, not celebrities, leading to authentic conversations and more actions per view.
  • Long-term partnerships & brand ambassadors: Instead of treating influencer posts as transactions, brands are investing in ongoing relationships. Always-on ambassador programs (6-12+ month engagements) turn creators into genuine brand advocates. The payoff is higher trust and recall: audiences see a creator consistently using a product and stop viewing it as just an ad. This continuity builds “memory structure” in consumers’ minds and delivers more predictable, repeatable ROI than one-off blasts.
  • Native, platform-fit storytelling: Content that feels organic to the platform vastly outperforms repurposed generic ads. In 2025, cross-posting the same polished ad across TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, etc., is a lazy move that audiences ignore. What works is letting creators integrate the brand naturally into their existing content style - be it a TikTok storytime, an Instagram Reel vlog, or a YouTube how-to. This way the promotion doesn’t stick out like a sore thumb. It’s storytelling by the creator, in their voice, for their channel. Brands supply talking points, but the best creators turn those into genuine narratives that resonate with their specific audience.
  • Creator-led content with amplification rights: When a creator strikes gold with a piece of content, savvy brands amplify it through paid social from the creator’s handle (a tactic known as whitelisting or Spark Ads). These often perform better than traditional ads because they carry the influencer’s authenticity and social proof. Brands negotiate content rights up front so they can boost posts and use creator content in ads, on websites, in emails, etc. The result: a native-looking ad with targeting and spend behind it. Many brands report double-digit CAC reductions when they promote creator-led assets versus their own creatives. In short, brand-safe content created by influencers, combined with paid amplification, is a potent combo in 2025.

Turn Influencers into a Scalable ROI Engine

Discover creators who match your audience right now and track every click and conversion.

Join the Waitlist

The Shift to Intent-Led Discovery (Our POV)

The biggest evolution underway is how brands find and choose influencers. It’s no longer about “renting reach” from popular creators; it’s about capturing moments of high intent.

From "Renting Reach" to Capturing Moments

Historically, influencer marketing was like renting a billboard: you paid a big name to blast a message, hoping their followers care. Now, a smarter approach is emerging - one that zeroes in on in-market moments. Instead of asking “Which influencer has audience X?”, brands ask “Who is talking about this specific experience or need right now that aligns with our product?”

This intent-led discovery means using intent signals – real-life events, behaviors, or transitions – to find creators whose recent content suggests timely relevance. For example, a travel brand might want creators who just experienced flight delays, or a baby products brand might seek new-parent creators currently posting about sleepless nights. By targeting moments of intent, you’re meeting the audience when a product recommendation will feel most relevant (and be most welcomed).

Social platforms are teeming with these intent signals (posts, stories, tweets about life events and pain points), but historically they were hard to search and sort. That’s changing with better tools and AI. Instead of “renting” an influencer’s general reach, marketers can now capture intent-rich moments when a creator’s content aligns perfectly with the brand’s solution.

Examples You Can Search Right Now

To make this concrete, here are some intent-led searches a modern brand might run:

  • “Travel creators who posted about a major flight delay in the last 7 days.” - A travel insurance or luggage brand’s dream: creators who recently had travel woes. Their experience is fresh, their audience is empathizing, and a related product mention won’t feel out of place but rather helpful.
  • “Tech bloggers who just switched from Android to iPhone.” - Perfect for a case manufacturer or app developer targeting switchers. These creators are literally documenting a purchase/transition moment.
  • “New-parent influencers mentioning sleep training in the last month.” - A baby sleep aid or nursery gadget company can reach creators in the thick of the problem its product solves.
  • “Beauty gurus discussing rosacea flare-ups this week.” - An ideal match for a skincare brand with a rosacea treatment. The key is recency: the creator is currently dealing with the issue, so a product collaboration is timely and credible.

These aren’t hypothetical - social content is now indexed and discoverable. Even Google’s search index increasingly surfaces social posts, making it possible to find influencers by queries like “Toronto content creator travel delay.” Dedicated influencer discovery tools (including our own) use AI to scan recent posts for these signals, surfacing the right creators at the right moments.

Why Intent Beats Interest

This shift from generic interest to specific intent is a game-changer. Here’s why intent-led targeting outperforms interest-based targeting:

  • Higher relevance = higher conversion. Someone talking about needing a solution (intent) is far more likely to act on a recommendation than someone who just has a general interest. For example, an influencer who mentions “I can’t find a good vegan protein powder” is a goldmine if you sell one - much more than an influencer who simply lists “fitness” in their bio. Matching on intent produces message-market fit. Brands see better click-through and conversion rates when the content is solving a timely need, not just aligned with a broad category.
  • Authenticity and credibility. When a creator’s post organically discusses a pain point or milestone, any brand integration around that topic feels more organic. The creator isn’t shoehorning a product where it doesn’t belong; they’re genuinely addressing something top-of-mind. Audiences pick up on this authenticity, resulting in higher trust. (Contrast this with the old model of random ads that often felt tone-deaf or out-of-context.)
  • Faster learning cycles. Intent signals have a short half-life - a trending topic or fresh experience might be relevant for a few days or weeks. By tapping into them, brands can run quick tests with content that’s hyper-relevant now. If it works, great - double down. If not, you learn fast and move on. It’s a more agile approach than lengthy campaigns planned around broad interests. The feedback loop from intent-led campaigns is quick, helping optimize messaging and targeting in near-real time.

Bottom line: intent-led influencer discovery turns social content into a predictable acquisition channel. By focusing on when and why an audience might care (recent events, needs, stories) rather than just who has followers, brands can dramatically improve the efficiency of their influencer spend.

The R×R×C Scoring Model (Relevance × Recency × Credibility)

To operationalize this intent-led approach, it helps to have a framework. Enter R×R×C, which stands for Relevance × Recency × Credibility. This is our guiding model for scoring and prioritizing creators (and their posts) for potential collaborations.

Relevance - "Fit" on Topic & Audience

Relevance is about how well the creator’s content and audience align with your brand or campaign topic. Questions to ask:

  • Topical fit: Does this creator frequently talk about themes related to your product or industry? (If you sell hiking gear, a travel vlogger who often hikes is relevant; a beauty guru, not so much.)
  • Audience match: Are the creator’s followers the people you’re trying to reach? Check demographics, interests, and community vibe.
  • Past brand alignments: Have they organically mentioned products like yours or perhaps even competitors (which can actually be a good sign of interest)?

High relevance means the influencer naturally reaches your target customers and can talk about your space without it seeming out of left field. This factor was always important, but in 2025, with advanced tools, we can quantify relevance (e.g., via topic modeling of their last 100 posts).

Recency - Fresh Signals & Timeliness

Recency gauges how recent and frequent the creator’s pertinent signals are. In other words, are they currently talking about the relevant topic or intent?

We look at:

  • Fresh mentions: Has this person posted about the key topic or need in the past day? 7 days? 30 days? The more recent, the better. Social media moves fast, and a post from yesterday carries more weight than one from last year.
  • Frequency: Do they discuss this topic often or was it a one-off? Someone who tweets about “startup life” every day is a stronger bet for a B2B SaaS tool than someone who mentioned it once last summer.
  • Trend alignment: Are they on top of current trends or events in this space? Keeping up with trends is routinely cited as one of the toughest jobs in influencer marketing. An influencer providing real-time commentary or experiences is hugely valuable.

Why recency matters: catching a creator in the moment of relevance means any collaboration will feel timely. You’re riding the wave of an existing conversation rather than trying to spark a cold one. In scoring, a post from this week about the problem your product solves would boost a creator’s rank significantly.

Credibility - Authenticity & Trust Signals

Credibility measures how genuinely influential and trustworthy a creator is on the topic. It’s not just about follower count; it’s about influence quality. Some credibility indicators:

  • Engagement quality: Look beyond like counts. Are people leaving thoughtful comments or just fire emojis? A smaller creator who sparks real dialogue might be more credible than a larger one with shallow comments.
  • Sentiment and authenticity: Does the creator come off as a genuine user of products, or do they feel like an “ad machine”? For example, an influencer whose feed is 90% sponsored content might have lower credibility (audiences can develop ad fatigue or skepticism). Contrast that with a creator who only partners with brands they truly use and love - their endorsements carry weight.
  • Expertise or experience: Particularly for niches, does the creator have legit expertise? A certified nutritionist talking about supplements has built-in credibility. A tech reviewer known for deep dives will be trusted on gadget recommendations.
  • Consistency in values: If your brand stands for sustainability and the creator has a history of eco-friendly content, their advocacy will appear more credible and congruent.

Credibility is perhaps the hardest factor to quantify, but tools are getting better at estimating it (through sentiment analysis, past collabs, ratio of sponsored:organic posts, etc.). Ultimately, you want creators who not only reach an audience, but truly influence that audience’s opinions and behaviors.

Composite Score - Prioritizing Outreach

When you multiply (or more realistically, weigh and combine) Relevance, Recency, and Credibility, you get a composite R×R×C score. This score helps prioritize which creators (and even specific posts) to target first in your outreach or campaign planning.

For example, say you find a creator who:

  • Often talks about a topic related to your product (high relevance),
  • Posted about it twice this week (high recency),
  • Has great audience trust and authentic engagement (high credibility).

That person is a top priority – a likely high-ROI partner. Meanwhile, someone with huge reach but low topical relevance or engagement might score low and be a lower priority despite their follower count.

In practice, we use R×R×C scoring to narrow a list of perhaps hundreds of potential influencers down to a shortlist of the best fits. It’s a way to inject objectivity and data into what used to be a gut-feel game of influencer selection.

Pro tip: Don’t just look at creator-level R×R×C; look at content-level too. Sometimes a specific post (say a viral TikTok about a problem your product solves) is the entry point—even if the creator wasn’t on your radar. High-scoring posts can signal an up-and-coming creator or just a one-time content opportunity to leverage via whitelisting or content licensing.

The Modern Influencer Marketing Playbook (Step-by-Step)

Bringing it all together, here’s a step-by-step playbook for modern influencer marketing success. Whether you’re refreshing a stale program or starting from scratch, these steps will guide you away from the “dead” tactics and toward an evolved, ROI-positive program:

  1. Define Outcomes & Guardrails

    • Begin with the end in mind. Choose a primary KPI (e.g., CPL < $X, CAC payback in Y months, X% sales lift).
    • Set non‑negotiable guardrails (budget limits, brand safety, FTC/ASA compliance).
    • Your KPI determines creator fees, incentives, and pacing.
  2. Audience Hypothesis (Jobs to Be Done)

    • Clarify who you’re trying to influence and why they care.
    • Identify triggers/intent moments (e.g., moving, new parent, training for a marathon).
    • This informs which intent signals to target in discovery.
  3. Intent‑Led Discovery

    • Run 3–5 searches based on your hypothesis; shortlist 20–50 creators with strong R×R×C.
    • Include all tiers; micros often hide the best ROI.
    • Prioritize creators signaling timely relevance in recent posts.
  4. Vetting & Quality Check

    • Review content for brand safety and proper disclosure history.
    • Inspect comments for authentic engagement vs bots.
    • Check partnership history for saturation/conflicts.
  5. Deal Structure & Incentives

    • Use hybrid comp: base + performance (affiliate/bonuses).
    • Prefer multi‑month ambassadorships over one‑offs; define usage rights/whitelisting and deliverables.
    • Align incentives so creators win when you win.
  6. Creative Brief (Empower the Creator)

    • Provide talking points and must‑haves (handles, tags, codes) plus brand guardrails.
    • Don’t script; encourage native storytelling and format fit.
    • Suggest arcs or formats (unboxing, day‑in‑the‑life) without dictating voice.
  7. Measurement Plan

    • Set up UTMs, unique codes, and post‑purchase surveys before launch.
    • Establish baselines; where possible, use geo/control holdouts.
    • Tie activity to outcomes (traffic, sign‑ups, revenue), not vanity metrics.
  8. Launch, Learn, and Optimize

    • Monitor first 7–21 days for early signals; boost winners (with permissions).
    • Iterate messaging/creative; prune low performers and scale high performers.
    • Refresh creatives regularly to avoid fatigue; expand to similar creators once repeatable.

Following this playbook, influencer marketing stops being a hit-or-miss experiment and becomes a structured part of your marketing mix – one that you can forecast, scale, and optimize just like any other channel.

Budget & ROI Math

Let’s talk money and results. How do you budget for influencer campaigns in this new model, and how do you know if you’re getting ROI?

Start with a test cell approach: Rather than one big bet, structure your budget as a series of test cells. For example, allocate a budget for 5 creators × 3 posts each = 15 assets as an initial test. If an average micro‑influencer post costs $250 (rates vary), that’s about $3,750 in media cost. Add product gifting, platform fees, and any whitelisting ad spend, and a cell might total ~$5–6k. Plan a few cells (different creator tiers or content angles) to compare performance.

Estimate expected results: Influencer marketing isn’t as predictable as search ads, but you can set reasonable expectations from past campaigns or benchmark data. For example, if micro‑influencer posts average a 2% click‑through and 5% of visitors convert, each post reaching ~10,000 people might yield ~100 visits and ~5 conversions. Fifteen posts ≈ 75 conversions. With a $50 CPA target, $5k for 75 conversions is ~$66 CPA. Calibrate with your real numbers.

Monitor payback period: Track how quickly influencer‑driven customers pay back acquisition cost. If your AOV is $100 with 50% margin, you make ~$50 gross profit up front. At a $66 CPA you’re not profitable on first purchase, but strong repeat rates can close the gap within your acceptable payback window.

Expect a learning period: Results often appear within days, but optimal performance can take 2–3 weeks as content circulates and secondary engagement kicks in. Watch trends, not single‑day spikes. By ~21 days you should know your early winners and under‑performers.

Calculate true ROI: Tally all costs (fees, product costs, team time, amplification spend) and all attributable revenue (UTMs, codes, baseline lift). Don’t stop at impressions. Aim for a clear ROAS/ROI view; if it’s below target on a first test, document learnings and iterate.

Scale with confidence: Define scale triggers (e.g., “If 2+ creators deliver CAC < $50 and CTR > X, double next quarter with similar creators”). Build spend progressively. Many brands eventually allocate a large budget share to influencers after proving repeatability.

In summary, treat influencer spend like an investment portfolio: diversify initial bets, track performance diligently, cut the losers, and double down on the winners. When done right, the math should tell a story of improving returns, and you’ll know exactly when to pour in more resources.

Risks & Guardrails

No marketing strategy is without risks. Influencer marketing, when mishandled, can backfire. Keep these in check:

FTC/ASA compliance: Ensure transparent sponsorship disclosure (e.g., “#ad”). Bake requirements into contracts, educate creators, and spot‑check live posts.

Brand safety and reputation: Vet thoroughly and favor creators with strong track records. Maintain a crisis plan to pause or adjust quickly if needed.

Creator burnout and audience fatigue: Avoid oversaturation. Stagger campaigns, rotate ambassadors, and grant creative freedom alongside fair compensation.

Content rights and misuse: Define usage rights and timelines clearly. Don’t exceed agreed periods or alter context in ways that change intent.

Measurement pitfalls: Strengthen attribution. Use holdouts where possible and consider offline impact to avoid over‑ or under‑crediting.

With the above guardrails in place, you can reap the rewards of influencer marketing while minimizing surprises. Think of it like driving a fast car – you want good brakes and seatbelts even though you hope not to need them.

The Future: AI × Creator Commerce

Looking ahead, the convergence of AI, social media, and commerce is poised to further evolve influencer marketing. Expect social search to surface creator content directly in results, pushing brands to optimize not only their sites but their collaborations for discovery. Native shopping will continue to compress the path from content to checkout, tightening attribution. Compensation models will blend flat fees with performance incentives more often, rewarding creators who drive outcomes. AI will accelerate ideation and testing (from hook variants to caption suggestions), improving speed to learn. And in some niches, virtual personas and AR‑enhanced content will expand the definition of “creator.”

In summary, the future of influencer marketing will be even more integrated with technology and commerce. Influencers are the new storefronts, and AI is the new matchmaker and optimizer. The core principle remains: authenticity and relevance win. But the mediums and tools to deliver that are multiplying.

FAQs

FAQs

Answers to common questions

Is influencer marketing still effective in 2025?+
Yes - when done with modern strategies, it’s highly effective. What’s changed is how to make it effective. Old tactics like paying for one-off posts yield diminishing returns. Brands that collaborate with relevant, trusted creators in authentic ways see strong ROI. The industry continues to grow; the key is evolving your approach (micro-influencers, long-term partnerships, intent-led content).
Why do some brands think influencer marketing is “dying”?+
Usually due to outdated methods and weak measurement. If you pick creators by follower count and run one-off posts without attribution, results will disappoint. Do it smarter: better vetting, focus on genuine engagement and business metrics, and instrument proper tracking.
What will replace influencer marketing?+
There’s no replacement. Influencer marketing is blending with UGC, community, and affiliate programs. Expect more authentic formats and performance-linked compensation, not a wholesale replacement.
Micro vs. macro - which drives better ROI?+
Often micro-influencers deliver better ROI per dollar thanks to higher trust and engagement, while macros are useful for broad reach. A tiered approach works best: many micros/nanos for conversions, a few macros for scale. Always measure.
How do I measure influencer ROI accurately?+
Set up tracking before launch: UTM links, unique discount codes, post-purchase surveys, and where possible control groups or geo holdouts. Track both direct sales and assisted impact over a reasonable attribution window.
How do I find creators reacting to current events or life changes?+
Use social listening and intent-led discovery. Search recent posts for timely signals (e.g., flight delays, moving, new parent). Dedicated tools can surface creators discussing these moments now, enabling highly relevant outreach.