Influencer Marketing APIs: The 2026 Ultimate Guide

"API access" might be the most abused phrase in influencer marketing software.

We've evaluated most of the influencer marketing APIs and creator discovery platforms while building Influship. Some offer genuine developer-grade APIs with comprehensive documentation. Others use "API" to describe what's essentially a CSV export with extra steps.

If you're building on influencer data (custom discovery tool, CRM enrichment, campaign tracking), choosing wrong wastes months. You'll hit undocumented rate limits, discover the "real-time data" is cached weekly, or watch your budget explode when credit costs triple at scale.

This guide covers the best influencer data APIs for developers: which platforms actually have them, what each one offers, and how to match an API to your use case. We're focused on creator discovery APIs and profile analytics, not campaign management integrations.

‍

TL;DR:

• Not all influencer APIs allow discovery. Many only let you look up profiles you've already found.
• Discovery APIs are cheaper and simpler. Raw APIs are fresher but cost more.
• Most platforms gate real API access behind enterprise sales.
• Choose based on what you're building, not database size.

What "API Access" Actually Means in Influencer Marketing Platforms

When a platform says "API access," they might mean:

• Export buttons. Download your data as CSV. Not an API.
• Webhooks only. Get notified when something happens. Can't query data.
• One-way sync. Pull data out, but can't search the platform's database.
• Lookup only. Get profiles you've already found. Can't discover new ones.
• Full REST API. Search, lookup, analytics, with real documentation.
• API-first. The API is the product, not an afterthought.

Example: GRIN offers two API versions. Their v1 is one-way: export creator lists, track orders, pull content. Their v2 adds bidirectional sync. But neither lets you search GRIN's database or discover creators programmatically. That's fine. GRIN is a campaign management platform, not a data provider. But if you need discovery, you'd waste weeks evaluating the wrong tool.

The database size on a marketing page tells you almost nothing. What matters is what you can query, how fresh it is, and what it costs at scale.

Before evaluating any platform, ask:

1. Can I programmatically search and filter creators? Or only pull profiles I've already found?
2. Is data real-time or cached? If cached, how stale?
3. Is pricing predictable? Or credit-based with opaque endpoint costs?

Two Types of Influencer APIs: Discovery vs Raw Data

Discovery APIs

Pre-processed, indexed, searchable. The platform has crawled profiles, analyzed audiences, and organized everything into a queryable database.

Best for: Finding creators by filters, audience analysis, building dashboards, bulk operations.

Trade-off: Data might be hours or days old. You're querying snapshots.

Examples: Modash Discovery API, HypeAuditor, Influencers.Club, Influship

Raw/Live APIs

Real-time, on-demand pulls. Each request fetches current data from the source.

Best for: Verifying profiles before outreach, tracking live campaign metrics, monitoring content.

Trade-off: More engineering required. Higher cost per request. Tighter rate limits.

Examples: Modash Raw API, Phyllo

Common Influencer API Use Cases

Don't start with "which platform has the most features." Start with what you're building.

Building a White-Label Discovery Platform

You're an agency or SaaS building creator discovery for clients.

Need: Large searchable database, flexible filters, bulk pagination, audience demographics.

Prioritize: Database coverage, query speed, per-query cost (adds up fast).

Best fit: Modash, Influencers.Club, or CreatorIQ (enterprise budget).

Avoid: Lookup-only APIs or those requiring creator authentication.

Enriching Your CRM or Outreach Tool

You have creator handles or emails. You want profile data, audience info, engagement metrics.

Need: Lookup by handle/email/URL, structured profile data, cross-platform identity resolution.

Prioritize: Enrichment endpoints, email-to-profile mapping, cost per lookup.

Best fit: Influship (identity resolution across platforms), Influencers.Club (email enrichment), Phyllo (if creators authenticate).

Avoid: Discovery APIs that charge per search when you already know who you're looking for.

Tracking Campaign Performance

You need live metrics from active campaigns.

Need: Real-time data, post-level analytics, content monitoring, webhooks.

Prioritize: Data freshness, tracking endpoints, webhook support.

Best fit: Modash Raw API, Phyllo (with creator auth).

Avoid: Aggregated APIs with weekly refresh cycles.

Influencer Marketing Platforms With Real Developer APIs

Six platforms worth evaluating. We're starting with Influship because we built it and know it best—but we'll be honest about where others might fit better.

Influship

Database: 10M+ creators with cross-platform identity resolution
Platforms: Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, X
Pricing: API access by request

Most influencer APIs make you think in filters: follower count ranges, engagement rate thresholds, location dropdowns. Influship works differently. You describe what you're looking for in plain language, and the system finds creators who match.

"Fitness creators in LA who post about running" returns different results than manually setting category=fitness, location=Los Angeles, and hoping running content appears. The natural language search understands context, aesthetics, and content themes that don't fit into dropdown menus.

The other differentiator is identity resolution. The same creator has an Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube account—Influship connects them into a single profile. When you're building outreach lists, you're not accidentally contacting the same person three times through different handles.

Where it's weaker: The database is smaller than competitors. If you need 350M profiles to search through, Modash or Influencers.Club has more raw volume. Influship is built for precision over coverage. A filter-based search for "fitness influencers in LA" might return 3,000 results you have to manually review. Influship returns 40 you'd actually email.

The honest pitch: If you've used filter-based discovery and found it frustrating—too many irrelevant results, too much manual review—natural language search is a different experience. If you just need to pull large lists by follower count and category, a bigger database might serve you better.

Modash

Database: 350M+ creators
Platforms: Instagram, TikTok, YouTube
Pricing: Discovery API from $16,200/year; Raw API from $10,000/year

Modash offers two distinct APIs: Discovery for searching and filtering their indexed database, and Raw for pulling live data on-demand.

Strengths: Documentation includes quickstart guides, interactive API reference, and code samples in multiple languages. Time from signup to working API call is under an hour. The Discovery API uses a credit system where different endpoints cost different amounts. Profile searches are cheaper than full audience demographic reports.

Where it lacks: Three platforms only. No Twitter, Twitch, LinkedIn, or anything beyond IG/TikTok/YouTube. Pricing starts at $16K/year for Discovery, $10K/year for Raw. At scale, you need to architect around credit costs: caching aggressively, batching requests, avoiding redundant calls.

Best for: Teams building white-label discovery tools or internal dashboards who need both analyzed data and real-time verification, and who only care about the big three platforms.

HypeAuditor

Database: 219M+ creators (adds ~15K daily)
Platforms: Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, X, Twitch
Pricing: Enterprise quotes only

Strengths: Fraud detection focus. Includes audience quality scores, fake follower analysis, and engagement authenticity checks. Five platform coverage including X and Twitch.

Where it lacks: No public API documentation. No pricing without a sales call. No way to test endpoints before committing. High price point (reportedly $30K+/year) makes it unviable for smaller teams or early-stage products.

Best for: Enterprise teams where fraud detection and audience authenticity are primary concerns, and where going through a sales process is acceptable.

Influencers.Club

Database: 340M+ creators
Platforms: 12 platforms including Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, Twitch, X, LinkedIn, Reddit, Discord, OnlyFans
Pricing: Credit-based, no public pricing

Strengths: Broadest platform coverage. Includes Reddit, Discord, and LinkedIn where most competitors have no data. Email enrichment feature: submit an email address, get back associated social profiles (and reverse). Integrates with Clay, HubSpot, and Zapier for workflow automation.

Where it lacks: Credit costs per endpoint aren't published. Requires a sales call to understand actual usage costs. At scale, credit-based pricing can surprise teams who budget for X and spend 3X.

Best for: Teams that need multi-platform coverage beyond the big three, or who are building around email enrichment workflows.

CreatorIQ

Database: 1 billion+ accounts analyzed, 15-20M indexed
Platforms: Multi-platform
Pricing: From $2,350/month, annual commitment

Strengths: Largest indexed database. Indexes over a billion social accounts with detailed profiles on 15-20 million creators. Sophisticated API capabilities. Used by large brands and agencies.

Where it lacks: Minimum ~$28K/year with annual commitment. No free trial or sandbox. Documentation requires a sales conversation, so no way to evaluate API quality before committing.

Best for: Enterprise teams with budget who need scale and are willing to go through a formal procurement process.

Phyllo

Database: N/A (pulls authenticated creator data)
Platforms: 20+ including LinkedIn, YouTube, Instagram, TikTok, Twitch
Pricing: Custom, contact required

Architecturally different. Instead of a crawled database, Phyllo connects directly to platforms via creator OAuth. The creator authenticates, and you pull their data with permission.

Strengths: Higher data accuracy (verified data, not scraped estimates). Access to platforms like LinkedIn that don't allow scraping. 20+ platform coverage. Public documentation at docs.getphyllo.com allows evaluation before sales engagement.

Where it lacks: Authentication requirement limits use cases. Can't look up arbitrary creators. Not usable for discovery or cold outreach. Only works when creators opt in.

Best for: Platforms building products where creators onboard and authenticate. Marketplaces, creator economy tools, applications that need verified data with creator consent.

‍

How to Evaluate an Influencer Data API

Features don't matter if the developer experience is broken. Here's how to actually evaluate.

The 30-Minute Test

1. Request documentation. Not marketing pages. Technical docs. If they require a sales call, that's a signal about developer priorities.
2. Check for sandbox or trial. Can you make real API calls before signing? If not, you're buying blind.
3. Time to first call. Sign up and time how long until a working API call. Under an hour is good. Days is a warning.
4. Test edge cases. What happens at rate limits? Missing profiles? Special characters?

What to Check in Documentation

• Quickstart with working code samples
• Interactive reference (try calls in browser)
• Examples in cURL, Python, JavaScript minimum
• Clear error codes
• Recent changelog (updated in last 6 months)

Calculate True Cost

Credit-based pricing surprises people. A real scenario:

You budget for 3,000 profile lookups monthly. But audience demographics cost 5 credits per profile while basic data costs 1 credit. You're actually burning 15,000 credits. Your overage rate is 3x in-plan. Your $500 budget just became $2,000.

Ask before signing:

• What does one credit get me, per endpoint?
• What's the overage rate?
• Is there a spending cap?

Hidden Costs to Factor In

Integration time: Bad docs might take 2-3 weeks to integrate. Good docs, 2-3 days. At $50-150/hour, 10 extra developer days cost $4,000-12,000 before you make a production request.

Lock-in: Building on proprietary formats makes switching expensive. Abstract your integration behind an internal interface.

Red Flags

• No public documentation
• Credit system without per-endpoint costs published
• No sandbox or trial
• Docs haven't been updated in 12+ months
• "Contact sales" as only path to access

Frequently Asked Questions

Do influencer marketing platforms offer public APIs?
Some do. Modash and Phyllo have public documentation you can review before talking to sales. Most others (HypeAuditor, CreatorIQ, Influencers.Club) require a sales conversation before you can see technical docs or pricing.

Can you discover creators via API, or only look them up?
It depends on the platform. Discovery APIs (Modash, Influship, Influencers.Club) let you search and filter their database programmatically. Lookup-only APIs require you to already have a handle or profile URL. Phyllo is different: it only works with creators who authenticate via OAuth.

Are influencer APIs real-time?
Most are not. Discovery APIs query pre-indexed databases that might be hours or days old. For real-time data, you need a Raw API (like Modash Raw) or an authenticated connection (like Phyllo). Expect to pay more for freshness.

Why are influencer APIs so expensive?
Crawling, processing, and indexing millions of social profiles is expensive. Fraud detection and audience analysis add more cost. The platforms that offer genuine developer APIs are building infrastructure, not just reselling scraped data.

Can I use influencer APIs without a sales contract?
Rarely. Most platforms gate API access behind enterprise sales. Modash publishes pricing. Influship offers API access by request without requiring an enterprise commitment. But for most options, expect a sales process.

What's the difference between scraped data and authenticated data?
Scraped data comes from publicly visible profiles. It's an estimate, might be stale, and can miss private metrics. Authenticated data (via OAuth, like Phyllo) comes directly from the platform with creator permission. It's more accurate but requires the creator to opt in.

Conclusion

Most influencer "APIs" fall into two camps: expensive platforms with sales-gated access, or tools where "API" means "data export."

The decision comes down to three questions:

1. What are you building? Discovery tool, CRM enrichment, or campaign tracking? The architecture you need follows from the use case.
2. What's your real budget? Credit-based pricing surprises people. Get the per-endpoint costs and calculate at your actual expected volume.
3. Can you evaluate before committing? Public docs, sandbox access, and clear pricing are signals that a platform respects developers. Sales-gated everything is a signal they don't.

If you've been frustrated by filter-based discovery, Influship's natural language search is worth a look. Describe the creator you want in plain English, and get results that actually match.